Often, when someone reveals a break with Christianity, those who remain within the Christian fold assume that the one who left is "angry with God". Alternatively, the assumption is that the one who left the church has done so in order to be free of biblical/church restrictions on conduct and behavior. While this may be the case for some, this was not my thinking. And thinking it was, rather than an emotional reaction.
One of the positions that people take as regards to religion or faith that I cannot truly understand is a refusal to consider alternatives. "There's nothing that can shake my faith", or "nothing you can say can talk me out of what I believe". While steadfastness in the face of adversity or persecution is admirable, often it is a refusal or inability to think about what one believes. While many people have thought deeply about their faith and made reasoned decisions about it, I'm not convinced that this represents a majority. One thing that I have long attempted to do was to question what I believed and considered possible alternatives. My leaving the Catholic Church and embracing the teachings of The Way International was a decision that I made after weighing the evidence. In retrospect I didn't have enough information to accurately form a judgement about what The Way was saying, but at the time it made sense. I wasn't mad at the Church, or the Pope or anyone or anything, I just thought The Way made more sense. Similarly, when I left The Way, I had spent a full year examining what they had been teaching and came to the decision that it no longer made sense to me. Granted, what got me started was immoral and unethical behavior by the leader and chief teacher, but in the end I would have retained the beliefs that I had learned in The Way if they still made sense.
Finally, my decision to no longer consider myself a Christian came after more thought and introspection. Once again, I wasn't mad at anyone, but had come to the conclusion that there was no reason that I could see to view the Bible as having come from God or view it as superior to any other "holy" book. At best it was a collection of books, essays and letters that reflected how various people had viewed God over the years.
Does my tendency to question and my willingness to change make me better than anyone else, or even think that I'm better than anyone else? To quote State Senator Ernie Chambers from last year's dedication of a Humanist/Atheist exhibit at the State Capitol: "It's not my place to tell you that something that gets you through the night is wrong. Everyone is entitled to have whatever beliefs help make them a better person. What is wrong is when we try to legislate some people's opinions for everybody. Then we have a problem." I may be completely wrong about the Biblical God and Christianity. Those who espouse Pascal's Wager might suggest that since I don't know, the safer course would be to believe in the Christian God. But Pascal engaged in a logical fallacy when he formulated his famous wager; it's a false dilemma - there aren't only two choice: believe in God or don't believe in God. There are a multitude of choices: be a Christian and be an atheist are certainly two among them, but there are many choices as to what kind of Christian to be; others choices include be a Muslim, be a Buddhist, be a Pagan, follow Hawaiian huna, venerate the Hindu gods, convert to Asatru and worship the Norse pantheon and on and on. So the wager doesn't really make sense.
When I finally get to the part of my journey since leaving Christianity, it will be evident that I am constantly changing, evolving and looking for more evidence.
Part Three up next!
Tuesday, August 29, 2017
Sunday, August 13, 2017
Religious Work-Arounds
I just finished reading an article about a New Jersey town attempting to prevent local Jews from extending their eruv. What's an eruv you ask? To answer that question you have to go back to Talmudic and Rabbinic law which interprets the laws and strictures in the Torah. The principle in the Torah is that the Sabbath is a day of rest and that no work is to be done on it. That sounds pretty simple, but people being people, they needed clarification, they needed a definition of what "work" included. There are thousands of words written delineating what work is, but what is relevant here is the section that defines "carrying any object from a private place (like your home) to a public place" (like the grocery store or even the synagogue) as work. "Objects" are further defined as anything other than the clothes on your back, including your house keys, pushing a baby stroller or even an umbrella. Obviously this would cause problems if strictly adhered to. A "solution" had to be found; and by "solution" I mean a way to technically observe the rule while simultaneously getting around it. This work-around involved attaching some physical extension to the home that enlarged what would be considered the "private" space. In earlier times Jews tended to be segregated from the Christians and the walls of their ghetto served to separate what was inside (private) from what was outside (public). In modern times the extension usually takes the form of wires attached to utility poles, enclosing the neighborhood, or in some cases a whole municipality. So what you have is a fairly simple commandment: "Rest, i.e. do no work", that has been complicated beyond belief, but rather than admit that the rules are ridiculous, and say "we're just not going to do it", ways to get around the rules while technically obeying them are devised. Orthodox Jews can still claim to follow The Law, while being able to circumvent it in order to live their modern lives.
Lest you think it's just those crazy Jews who do things like this, I was involved in a Christian fringe group a few years ago that interpreted a verse that said "Owe no man any thing, only to love" as a prohibition against any kind of debt. While not as labyrinthine as the Talmudic rules, this organization, The Way International, had all kinds of rules about what was debt and what was not, but were very firm about prohibiting their members from having bank loans. This obviously would cause a problem for anyone wanting to buy a home, since it is unlikely that anyone other than the very wealthy would have enough cash on hand to buy a home without securing a loan. What some Way people did was convince a non-Way family member to buy the home and sell it to the Way family member in some complicated deal that they convinced themselves wasn't debt. I never understood this maneuver, since you were still in debt, just not to a bank. The most creative debt avoidance move that I saw involved a guy who was buying his home from his parents a little at a time. Rather than call it a loan, he called it partial ownership. If he paid them $10,000 on a $100,000 home, then he owned 10% and they owned 90%. If he paid an additional $20,000, he now owned 30% and so on. He peddled this theory to Way leadership, but we never found out how well it worked since his parents died in a car crash and he inherited the home outright.
Finally, there's the example of the annulment. Some churches are against divorce and even consider it adultery if a divorced person remarries. But there is a loophole, the annulment. A marriage that is annulled is treated as if it never existed. While I can imagine circumstances where a church might want to make an exception to their no-divorce rule, (e.g. underage bride or groom, diminished capacity, human trafficking) I know personally of situations where an annulment was sought and granted simply to recognize a divorce and get the couple back into the church's good graces. We don't believe in divorce but we'll grant you this divorce as long as we don't call it a divorce.
What are we to make of all this? These are just a few examples that have popped up in my news feed or in conversations recently. I think that in general people like to talk the talk and put their holy books and pronouncements by holy men up on pedestals, but when it gets in the way of what they really want to do, or if it becomes inconvenient, they still want to talk the talk without walking the walk.
Lest you think it's just those crazy Jews who do things like this, I was involved in a Christian fringe group a few years ago that interpreted a verse that said "Owe no man any thing, only to love" as a prohibition against any kind of debt. While not as labyrinthine as the Talmudic rules, this organization, The Way International, had all kinds of rules about what was debt and what was not, but were very firm about prohibiting their members from having bank loans. This obviously would cause a problem for anyone wanting to buy a home, since it is unlikely that anyone other than the very wealthy would have enough cash on hand to buy a home without securing a loan. What some Way people did was convince a non-Way family member to buy the home and sell it to the Way family member in some complicated deal that they convinced themselves wasn't debt. I never understood this maneuver, since you were still in debt, just not to a bank. The most creative debt avoidance move that I saw involved a guy who was buying his home from his parents a little at a time. Rather than call it a loan, he called it partial ownership. If he paid them $10,000 on a $100,000 home, then he owned 10% and they owned 90%. If he paid an additional $20,000, he now owned 30% and so on. He peddled this theory to Way leadership, but we never found out how well it worked since his parents died in a car crash and he inherited the home outright.
Finally, there's the example of the annulment. Some churches are against divorce and even consider it adultery if a divorced person remarries. But there is a loophole, the annulment. A marriage that is annulled is treated as if it never existed. While I can imagine circumstances where a church might want to make an exception to their no-divorce rule, (e.g. underage bride or groom, diminished capacity, human trafficking) I know personally of situations where an annulment was sought and granted simply to recognize a divorce and get the couple back into the church's good graces. We don't believe in divorce but we'll grant you this divorce as long as we don't call it a divorce.
What are we to make of all this? These are just a few examples that have popped up in my news feed or in conversations recently. I think that in general people like to talk the talk and put their holy books and pronouncements by holy men up on pedestals, but when it gets in the way of what they really want to do, or if it becomes inconvenient, they still want to talk the talk without walking the walk.
Tuesday, August 1, 2017
Lughnasadh 2017
As a modern pagan I've always made a habit of changing my spiritual outlook as circumstances change, my point of view changes, and as I see that certain things don't "work" or don't fit into reality as I observe it. I meditate and do shamanic journeying, but have come to the conclusion that it doesn't matter if what I "see" during times of altered consciousness is objectively real or "just" exists in my mind. Are the gods objectively real, or just expressions of greater truth? Who cares? How about magic? If doing a ritual helps me focus so that I can mundanely bring my will to pass, what difference does it make if it's supernatural or not?
One of the things that I'm relatively faithful at doing as part of my pagan spiritual practice is spending some time in "the woods", i.e. Wilderness Park at every one of the sabbats. Today was Lughnasadh, the "cross quarter" day approximately halfway between the summer solstice and the autumn equinox. There's a variety of ways that modern pagans view this sabbat, one, which I subscribe to, connects it to the first harvests. It's a time when plans begin to come to fruition. If you compare the Wheel of the Year to a person's life, with either Samhain or Yule as the beginning and end, Lughnasadh is about where I am now, about ¾ of the way through a typical lifespan. And wouldn't you know it - in a lot of ways things are coming together pretty well. I live a stable, yet fulfilling life, with a great wife and pretty cool adult kids; I have a job that is challenging yet not stressful, I make a difference in people's lives a wedding minister and I am beginning to get recognition for my main creative outlet: photography. As Lughnasadh marks a time in the year where the time of planting and growth is mostly past, but there is still plenty of time to reap and to enjoy the fruits of labor, so I stand at a similar point in the Wheel of Life.
This is one of the reasons why I do these nature walks on the sabbats - I get insight into life and living. This year was no exception.
One of the things that I'm relatively faithful at doing as part of my pagan spiritual practice is spending some time in "the woods", i.e. Wilderness Park at every one of the sabbats. Today was Lughnasadh, the "cross quarter" day approximately halfway between the summer solstice and the autumn equinox. There's a variety of ways that modern pagans view this sabbat, one, which I subscribe to, connects it to the first harvests. It's a time when plans begin to come to fruition. If you compare the Wheel of the Year to a person's life, with either Samhain or Yule as the beginning and end, Lughnasadh is about where I am now, about ¾ of the way through a typical lifespan. And wouldn't you know it - in a lot of ways things are coming together pretty well. I live a stable, yet fulfilling life, with a great wife and pretty cool adult kids; I have a job that is challenging yet not stressful, I make a difference in people's lives a wedding minister and I am beginning to get recognition for my main creative outlet: photography. As Lughnasadh marks a time in the year where the time of planting and growth is mostly past, but there is still plenty of time to reap and to enjoy the fruits of labor, so I stand at a similar point in the Wheel of Life.
This is one of the reasons why I do these nature walks on the sabbats - I get insight into life and living. This year was no exception.
Wednesday, July 19, 2017
Bitter?
Before I start in, let me make clear that I have no problem with people who pray for things. I don't think that they're stupid or deluded, I just don't agree with them that it's effective. I don't particularly want people praying for me, and if they do, I don't want to hear about it, especially if they're praying for me to "see the light" or similar. Usually when I see people ask for prayer for themselves or others I keep my mouth shut and don't comment, it's not my place to try & dissuade them and the timing would usually be terrible! That all being said, it's been my observation that people who pray to get healed fail to get healed as often as they do get healed. When someone recovers, then "praise God!", but when they fail to recover it's either ignored or chalked up to something along the lines of God's "mysterious ways", or ultimate plan. But that's all hypothetical, let's move on to a specific example, as illustrated by the Facebook thread to the left.
Granted, I knew that I was starting trouble with my comment, but the person who was healing in this instance, unless he has changed greatly in the last year and a half, is not religious and was probably not praising God for the fact that his injury was healing. (The person making the initial comment is not the person who was injured). So I thought that I was on safe ground making a comment. Notice that, although one might easily infer that I was disagreeing with or contradicting the God praiser, my actual words merely added a group who merited some praise. (Not to mention the fact that our bodies naturally heal from minor injuries with or without prayer) I was then asked who "gave" the medical professionals their expertise. Even if one believes that there is power in prayer, surely my answer was logical, rational and fact-based...with no name-calling! But it's the response to that which really got my attention:
Granted, I knew that I was starting trouble with my comment, but the person who was healing in this instance, unless he has changed greatly in the last year and a half, is not religious and was probably not praising God for the fact that his injury was healing. (The person making the initial comment is not the person who was injured). So I thought that I was on safe ground making a comment. Notice that, although one might easily infer that I was disagreeing with or contradicting the God praiser, my actual words merely added a group who merited some praise. (Not to mention the fact that our bodies naturally heal from minor injuries with or without prayer) I was then asked who "gave" the medical professionals their expertise. Even if one believes that there is power in prayer, surely my answer was logical, rational and fact-based...with no name-calling! But it's the response to that which really got my attention:
"Tom you seem bitter"
Bitter? I received no response to a request for an explanation of this characterization, other than that Jesus could heal "that". Now there might be areas where a case might be made for some bitterness in my life, likely harbor some toward my first wife for various reasons, and haven't quite put aside my attitude toward my former employer, but bitter...towards...what? Who? This seems to be a go-to response from some theists toward atheists, agnostics, skeptics and followers of other religions. There's an accusation that we're bitter towards God, or mad at God, or we hate God. I can't speak for a single person other than myself, but I arrived at my current worldview not because I was mad at any god or gods, but simply because it just didn't make sense to me any longer. If there is such a thing as "God", I don't see any evidence that he, she or it operates the way people think.
So folks, pray all that you want, but not everyone else does, and it's not because we're bitter.
Saturday, June 24, 2017
Yup, I Got Fired (No Not Recently!)
Why did I get fired from the leaderless local grocery chain?
Rumors abound, as they usually do. One tale was that I had an affair with a
subordinate, another had me fist-fighting with a customer. I’m sure some people
thought I was also responsible for the Russian hacking of the DNC. The incident for which I
was fired was described by the company as “improper conduct toward a customer”,
but more on that later.
I had been a manager at the leaderless local grocery chain for about 16 years. During the early years of that tenure I had acquired a
reputation for being hot-headed and a bit of a “yeller”. That reputation was well-earned. Before
being hired at the leaderless local grocery chain (henceforth LLGC) I had been
involved in a religious group wherein dictatorial methods were employed by the
putative leaders. Unfortunately, I had absorbed these toxic ways of managing
and applied them in my interactions with subordinates. There was also the bad
luck of being paired with a store manager, who, while a “nice guy”, was
completely conflict-averse and was very happy to allow me to be the bad cop in
any situation. He routinely promulgated policies which he did not enforce. When
I enforced them, employees complained to him and he would usually overrule me. So, during these early years of my career at LLGC, the combination
of my own abrasiveness and my boss’s spinelessness came together to brand me as
someone who was rough on people and did not make good managerial decisions.
In
later years, I would see that certain members of upper management never forgot
shortcomings, and once you acquired a “target on your back”, that target never
fully went away.
As a store-level manager the best thing to ever happen for
me was a new manager. My old store manager was transferred to another store and
an assistant store manager who had recently come to LLGC from another company
was promoted to store manager at my store. Almost overnight my role in the
store changed. When working as assistant to my first store manager I was the
management “asshole”; but the new guy was like a bull in a China shop. He was
aware of the first manager’s reputation as “nice guy” who let things go, and in
his role as “new sheriff in town” quickly began to lay down the law and whip
the place into shape (and other clichés). My
job was now mediating between the new boss and all the employees who were in a
state of shock over the new regime. For months I spent 45% of my time
convincing my boss not to fire good employees who just didn’t understand the
new way of doing things, 45% of my time convincing those same good employees to refrain
from walking out or punching their new boss in the face, and the remaining 10% of my time
doing all other aspects of my job. A year or so before the management change I
had been making an effort to be a better manager and be less abrasive; that
effort combined with the contrast between the old store manager and the new,
gave me a new image. I was still perceived by employees as someone who spoke
his mind and was direct in his interactions, but these personality traits were
now considered positive rather than
negative. After I was eventually transferred to another store many employees
expressed their desire that I come back!
It should be emphasized that I had few problems with
customers. In general I went out of my way to make things customer friendly,
sometimes vocally opposing company policies that I thought were onerous to our
shoppers. During the last meeting that I attended as a manager with LLGC I had an
intense argument with the CFO about a proposed policy that would have made
things easier for the accounting department, but that I predicted would be
resisted by customers. As a store manager myself during my final three years
with LLGC I pushed internal policies that went over and above what the company
expected.
I would be dishonest if I neglected to mention that I
occasionally ran afoul of company expectations during my time as an assistant
store manager. I was spoken to on a few
occasions about my use of social media that the company thought reflected
poorly on them, and was disciplined on one occasion for a prank gone bad. I was
a bit of a wild card in general, not shy about challenging authority or about
making wise-guy comments. But I had a goal of being promoted to the position of
store manager, having applied and been turned down eight or nine times. After
being passed over a number of times I asked the Vice-President of Operations,
who was the immediate supervisor of store directors, for input and guidance on
what I needed to do in order to be promoted. Eventually this paid off and I was
finally promoted. I assumed that my previous indiscretions and issues were
behind me, but I was mistaken. The target is never really off your back at
LLGC.
After about a year and a half as store manager, things were
looking good. I had a good team, I got along with my immediate supervisor and
despite the usual array of managerial problems, I liked going to work every
day. That all changed during my second Memorial Day weekend as a store manager.
I was working late on a Friday night. It was busy and the
store was as packed as it ever got. One of the cashiers had made an error and
had called me over to try to fix it. The error was such that fixing it at the
register, while technically possible
would have taken a long time, and I wasn’t really
sure how to do it. The best way to fix it was to bring the customer to our
customer service counter and have one of the clerks there take care of it.
Without getting into all the details of who said what to whom, the customer was
adamant that the problem be fixed at the register and accused me of being a
racist for wanting to take care of the problem by having the cashier bring him
over to the counter. He became increasingly loud and disruptive. Eventually I
asked him to leave the premises, which he eventually did.
The following morning I discovered an email from this
customer, a Ghanaian literature professor at UNL, sent to our home office
accusing me of threatening him and using profanity in addition to the
accusations of racism. He used the word “sinister”. Several employees who were
present backed up my version of events, but this customer was insistent that
the company take some action. The Directors of Loss Prevention and Human
Resources conducted an investigation which dragged on for weeks. At one point I
told my supervisor that I would write an apology to the customer, on the
condition that they understood that it was to satisfy his demands (he had
previously received an apology from a company representative, but stated that
he wanted an apology from me personally) and was not to be construed as an
admission of guilt on my part. I wrote the apology, vetted by the Director of
Human Resources so that it would not open the company to legal action, but the
customer did not accept it. At this point he appeared to consider anything less
than my termination as unacceptable.
Eventually, after weeks of this, I had a visit from two
members of senior management who still
hadn’t made up their minds regarding what action to take. They brought a copy of a video,
which only showed my feet and the feet of the customer, which allegedly
indicated that I had aggressively invaded his personal space. I ended up being disciplined for this supposed aggressive action,
as well as for tenuously related social media posts. The discipline included
counselling and probation. In addition, my annual review was coming up. On a
LLGC performance review if you received a “zero” in any category or the total score was below a certain benchmark you were given a
ninety-day period to correct any problems that were identified; if you didn't, you were fired. This incident
earned me a “zero” in one category and an overall low score. So in addition to the first probation, I had another ninety days on top of that. All of
these probations dragged out the time frame that I was dealing with this to
mid-November, almost six months after the original incident, six months during
which I didn’t know if I would have a job when it all was over. Part of the
terms of the probation was that I was to receive regular feedback from upper
management regarding my progress, which I was not receiving and had to agitate
for. I eventually received it, and at the end received a very good assessment
from my supervisor, as well as another excellent one the following year.
It seemed that I had escaped unscathed, but that target on
my back just got bigger; they never forget. The whole process soured me on the
way things were done at LLGC. I don’t think I ever really recovered from it.
There was a large portion of “I don’t give a shit” in my attitude from then on,
and a reluctance to put up with abuse from either customers or upper management.
The incident that sealed my fate occurred because I was a
wedding officiant. One of my employees asked me if I would be willing to
officiate a wedding in the store between two friends of hers, both women. I agreed. The couple bought their flowers and
cakes in the store and had a lunch in the Deli café as well. I thought that
having an actual wedding in the store would be a cool thing to do. Being aware
of possible prejudicial attitudes among our customers I did not post anything
on Facebook, but did post pictures on our internal social media site. Very
quickly the backlash started. The Director of Human Resources informed me that
several other store managers had complained about me conducting personal
business (my wedding business) on company time, despite me informing our office
personnel that I was taking a fifteen-minute break to do this. When I was
finally written up for this alleged infraction, a big deal was made of the fact
that my name-tag was clearly visible in the pictures (as if no one would have
known I was the store manager without the name tag), which was used as “proof”
that I was on the clock while conducting this wedding. Somehow they found out
that I had left a little early that day due to not taking a lunch break and
chided me for that, pointing out that I was in the café “during
lunchtime”. They did not see the contradiction between claiming that I was on
company time and at lunch at the same
time. It was also brought up that one of the brides had her dog with her – a
service dog for a veteran of the military, but that fact that it was a service
dog was ignored. At the same time I was criticized for attempting to hide it (I didn't get permission from my supervisor) and at the same time for publicizing it on the company social media site - contradictions abounded!
I found it hard to believe that any other store managers were complaining that they thought I was conducting private business on company time; I don’t think a store director existed that didn’t make doctor’s appointments or take care of other non-work-related business at work. I am convinced that any complaints were based on the fact that the marriage ceremony (which took all of 5 minutes) was between two women and not a man and a woman. The Human Resources Director let it slip that a store employee complained that this ceremony was “morally repugnant”, which confirmed my suspicions.
I found it hard to believe that any other store managers were complaining that they thought I was conducting private business on company time; I don’t think a store director existed that didn’t make doctor’s appointments or take care of other non-work-related business at work. I am convinced that any complaints were based on the fact that the marriage ceremony (which took all of 5 minutes) was between two women and not a man and a woman. The Human Resources Director let it slip that a store employee complained that this ceremony was “morally repugnant”, which confirmed my suspicions.
One thing that this HR Director was very, very good at was protecting
the company from legal action. I am convinced that this was when they decided to fire me, but that they knew that I
would easily be able to collect unemployment insurance. I was informed that any future problems, no matter the nature
would result in my termination.
One of the things that I insisted on as store manager was
that cashiers bag as they go if they did not have a bagger helping them, rather
than waiting until the whole order was rung up and then bagging. The reasons
for this are too boring to get into, but the short version is that I decided
that it made better customer service. I had two checkers, women on the far side
of forty, who resisted this policy. In addition, they frequently spent time
chatting with customers while another customer stood waiting for their orders
to be scanned. On one particular day my assistant store manager and I observed
one of these cashiers talking to a customer at length while a large order was
waiting to be started. As it went on and on, we wondered aloud what was going
on. Eventually (we later determined by watching video that it was over five
minutes) I went over to find out what the delay was. Now in telling this story
over the last year or so, some people have assumed that I was abrupt or
abrasive in my intervention. On the contrary, I was very aware that I needed to
avoid portraying this as a failing on the part of my employee in front of the
customer (even if it was) and that I needed to give off a friendly vibe. So,
smiling and relaxed, I asked the cashier “so, what’s happening here?” The
customer immediately became aggressive and confrontational, yelling and using
profanity. As he walked out the door he leaned into me and elbowed me. My
assistant store manager backed me up, but LLGC had their excuse for firing me
and they did.
Oddly enough, it took them another week to fire me. In the
interim I “volunteered” at the company sponsored Boo at the Zoo and attended an
all-day seasonal merchandising training session. An hour before the training
was to end my supervisor asked me to come see him before I left, since I was
planning to start a week-long vacation the next day. I was fired at that
meeting.
So I wasn’t fired for any of the numerous rumors that went
around, but for officiating a same-sex wedding that some bigots got offended
at, they then waited for another incident that would look better to the
Department of Labor when they tried to deny me unemployment benefits.
Tuesday, June 13, 2017
Forgive & Forget
Some years back, when I was a Christian, people would throw a verse around from Philippians about forgetting that which is behind, often times in order to avoid taking responsibility for their hurtful or irresponsible actions. Someone would do something, something that was a recurring negative theme in their lives, once again screwing over their friends and family, but you couldn't bring up that patter because that would be bringing up the past...which you were supposed to forget. Well I can't forget. I may be able to forgive, although I confess there are times when I'm unwilling to even do that, but I remember when people screw me over, again and again. I don't ignore the patterns. Now I'll gladly move on and let bygones be bygones if you stop doing that thing that you did, but if you start doing it again I'm not going to act like it's a new violation, a one-time trespass, I'm going to see it as what you do. Yesterday is not some airtight container, hermetically sealed off from today, the echoes and ripples of what you did yesterday leak into today. I've got people in my life who have hurt me in the same fashion over and over again. Even though I still hold out hope that they'll stop acting in this way, their past actions have not been forgotten and my perception of those actions molds my relationship to them. On the other hand, I have other people in my life who had at one time treated me horribly, yet some time ago stopped acting like that and never, not even once, slipped back into those habits with me.
I don't forget their past either, but view it as evidence that people do change, and never, ever, bring that past up...since they no longer do that thing that they did.
I don't forget their past either, but view it as evidence that people do change, and never, ever, bring that past up...since they no longer do that thing that they did.
Tuesday, May 23, 2017
Roll the Bones
Why do things happen? Are the good things the result of virtuous living? Praying? Magic? Are the bad things that happen our own damn fault? Everyone has their own theory about why things are the way they are. A prominent one involves the supernatural. Good things happen because you're blessed. God, or the Universe, or some other entity has seen fit, for whatever reason, to bestow blessings upon you. Usually the response to this is some feigned humility, because the subtext is, if you're blessed, surely you are special in some fashion in order to have earned the blessing. And when you think about it, if God is going to be handing out blessing to people who didn't do anything to deserve them, and there's no correlation between your actions and the receipt of blessings, then logically only two conclusions can derive from this premise. One is that there is no God, at least not one who is blessing people, and the good stuff is a result of your own effort, the other is that God is completely arbitrary and capricious and is just screwing with people. "No" you say, God answers prayers, it's not about how deserving you are, but how sincerely that you pray to Him. This assumes that those who pray get answers to their prayers and those who don't pray are left to their own devices. But we all know that a killer tornado wipes out the homes of people who pray and people who don't. Sure, we hear about that one family that prayed to be spared and their house wasn't touched, but we know damn well that all their neighbors prayed too. Once again the logical assumption is either that there is no God, or He is arbitrary and capricious.
Another explanation of why things happen is that everything that happens to you is somehow brought about by your own choices, your own believing, your own actions, "like drawn to like" or some such. While many things that happen to you, good or bad, are undoubtedly are a result of your own choices, this kind of thinking presumes that your own thinking can influence the thoughts and actions of the thousands of people with whom you interact. Interaction isn't limited to just the people that you actually, physically are in the same room with, but everyone, even those you'll never see, whose decisions affect your life, from the board of directors of your employer, the cars that you pass on the freeway, neighbor's dogs, the woman in line behind you at the grocery store; as well as all those people who took action ten years ago, the effects of which are just catching up to you today. Really, your thoughts are influencing all of them? The corollary to that theory is that you are being influenced by all of them. So chaotic that it would be similar to blind chance!
Yes, the decisions that you make and the actions that you take are a significant determinant in how your life turns out. Bad habits are going to limit your options, bad choices are going to push you along certain paths, but there's also the old philosophical school of "Shit Happens". While a decision to forgo college will certainly affect your employment options, whether or not you get hit by a truck that is speeding down the road just as you turn the corner is governed by so many variables, many of them random, that there's no way that you can foresee them all. There's no way that you can arrange your life so that nothing bad ever happens. Conversely there's nothing that you can do that will guarantee a bad outcome.
But everything that you do in life has ripples that spread forward in time. Your actions have effects that you may be dealing with for the rest of your life. Not only financial decisions, but decisions that affect the kind of person that you are and how people perceive you. Bad behavior at work can result in negative references that prevent you from easily getting another job; an ill-considered word can influence how friends and family think of you for years; cutting words can leave wounds that never heal. Even if you have completely changed, the old you still leaves echoes and ripples.
The other determinant in life, is the cards that you were dealt. Were your parents drug addicts or were you born the heir to a billionaire? Were you born completely healthy or did you start life with physical disabilities? Did you grow up in a safe and stable neighborhood, or in a city wracked by gang violence? Maybe you find out at age 40 that you have cancer or a heart condition, or some rare incurable disease. Sure anyone can theoretically overcome a rough start, but some don't have anything to overcome, do they?
So, why do "things" happen? It's complex, isn't it? What's in your genetic makeup? Where were you born? Who were your parents? What opportunities were you afforded? What decisions did you make to get you where you are? What decisions do you make very day? And finally, what unpredictable, random shit jumps out and says "boo"?
Fate is just the weight of circumstances
That's the way Lady Luck dances
Roll the Bones
Another explanation of why things happen is that everything that happens to you is somehow brought about by your own choices, your own believing, your own actions, "like drawn to like" or some such. While many things that happen to you, good or bad, are undoubtedly are a result of your own choices, this kind of thinking presumes that your own thinking can influence the thoughts and actions of the thousands of people with whom you interact. Interaction isn't limited to just the people that you actually, physically are in the same room with, but everyone, even those you'll never see, whose decisions affect your life, from the board of directors of your employer, the cars that you pass on the freeway, neighbor's dogs, the woman in line behind you at the grocery store; as well as all those people who took action ten years ago, the effects of which are just catching up to you today. Really, your thoughts are influencing all of them? The corollary to that theory is that you are being influenced by all of them. So chaotic that it would be similar to blind chance!
Yes, the decisions that you make and the actions that you take are a significant determinant in how your life turns out. Bad habits are going to limit your options, bad choices are going to push you along certain paths, but there's also the old philosophical school of "Shit Happens". While a decision to forgo college will certainly affect your employment options, whether or not you get hit by a truck that is speeding down the road just as you turn the corner is governed by so many variables, many of them random, that there's no way that you can foresee them all. There's no way that you can arrange your life so that nothing bad ever happens. Conversely there's nothing that you can do that will guarantee a bad outcome.
But everything that you do in life has ripples that spread forward in time. Your actions have effects that you may be dealing with for the rest of your life. Not only financial decisions, but decisions that affect the kind of person that you are and how people perceive you. Bad behavior at work can result in negative references that prevent you from easily getting another job; an ill-considered word can influence how friends and family think of you for years; cutting words can leave wounds that never heal. Even if you have completely changed, the old you still leaves echoes and ripples.
The other determinant in life, is the cards that you were dealt. Were your parents drug addicts or were you born the heir to a billionaire? Were you born completely healthy or did you start life with physical disabilities? Did you grow up in a safe and stable neighborhood, or in a city wracked by gang violence? Maybe you find out at age 40 that you have cancer or a heart condition, or some rare incurable disease. Sure anyone can theoretically overcome a rough start, but some don't have anything to overcome, do they?
So, why do "things" happen? It's complex, isn't it? What's in your genetic makeup? Where were you born? Who were your parents? What opportunities were you afforded? What decisions did you make to get you where you are? What decisions do you make very day? And finally, what unpredictable, random shit jumps out and says "boo"?
Fate is just the weight of circumstances
That's the way Lady Luck dances
Roll the Bones
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



